Hashtag Construction as Product of Symbolic Convergence: Berger and Luckmann’s Approach

Main Article Content

Rewindinar .
Pinckey Triputra
Frengki Napitupulu

Abstract

Social media refers to technology in which organizations and individuals interact with their audiences. Organizations and individuals interact through messages that each can produce. On the Twitter platform, conversation occurs through its special characteristic, namely the hashtag symbol. This interaction is interestingly analyzed through Berger and Luckmann's view that interpersonal social interaction is a social construction of reality. A view through this objective, symbolic, and subjective reality can then be a way for public relations to overcome the initial stage of a crisis. This research aimed to explore symbolic convergence process on Twitter hashtags in the construction of the reality of Berger and Luckmann as a mechanism for crisis communication management. This research used a constructivist paradigm with a netnographic method. The interactions observed at #BUMNdukungUMKM on August 16, 2020, were then analyzed with the Berger and Luckmann social constructionist approach. The results of this research are able to answer the research objectives where symbolic convergence is a process in social construction of reality. Hashtags are dynamic processes that can lead to social discourses. Hashtag construction is product of symbolic convergence on social media as a mechanism for crisis management.

Keywords:
Symbolic convergence, social construction, hashtag, interactions, crisis communication.

Article Details

How to Cite
., R., Triputra, P., & Napitupulu, F. (2020). Hashtag Construction as Product of Symbolic Convergence: Berger and Luckmann’s Approach. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 33(11), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2020/v33i1130267
Section
Original Research Article

References

Lai CH, Motivations, usage, and perceived social networks within and beyond social media. J. Comput. Commun. 2019;24(3): 126–145 DOI: 10.1093/jcmc/zmz004

Lovejoy K, Waters RD, Saxton GD. Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relat. Rev. 2012;38(2):313–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012-.01.005

Twitte, “How to use hashtags,” twitter.com; 2020. Available:https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/how-to-use-hashtags (Accessed Oct. 01, 2020).

Genpi.co/jpnn, “Luar Biasa! Tagar BUMN Dukung UMKM Trending Topik di Twitter,” jpnn.com; 2020. Available:https://www.jpnn.com/news/luar-biasa-tagar-bumn-dukung-umkm-trending-topik-di-twitter (Accessed Oct. 01, 2020).

Bormann EG. Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation. J. Commun. 1985;35(4):128–138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x

Golob U. Public relations and social theory: Key figures and concepts 20091 Edited by Øyvind Ihlen, Betteke van Ruler and Magnus Fredriksson. Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts . Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY and London,” Corp. Commun. An Int. J. 2009;14:470–473. DOI: 10.1108/13563280910998790.

Lister M. New Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge; 2003.

Castell M., The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishing; 2010.

van den Berg JA. “The story of the hashtag(#): A practical theological tracing of the hashtag(#) symbol on twitter. HTS Teol. Stud. / Theol. Stud. 2014;70(1):1–6. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v70i1.2706

Seward ZM. The first-ever hashtag, @-reply and retweet, as Twitter users invented them. Quartz; 2013. Available:https://qz.com/135149/the-first-ever-hashtag-reply-and-retweet-as-twitter-users-invented-them/ (Accessed Oct. 01, 2020).

Littlejohn SW, Foss KA, Oetzel JG. Theories of human communication. Waveland Press, Incorporated; 2017.

Griffin E. A first look at communication theory. 8th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2011.

Bormann EG. Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Q. J. Speech, 1972;58(4):396–407. DOI: 10.1080/00335637209383138

Ruben BD, Stewart L. Communication & human behavior. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt; 2016.

Cragan JF, Wright DW, Chris KR. Communication in small groups: Theory, process, skills; 2004.

Suryadi I. Teori konvergensi simbolik J. Acad. Fisip Untad. 2010;2(02):426–437. Available:jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index/.php/academica/article/view/2305/1494.

Coombs W. Future of crisis communication. 2014;395–402.

Bakos LA. Crisis management between public relations and the holonic multi-agent approach. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2018;238;527–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.032

Lattimore D, Baskin O, Heiman S, Toth E, Public relations: The Profession and the Practice, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2008.

Coombs T. Coombs WT. Protecting Organization reputations during a crisis: The Development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review. 2007;10(3), 163-177.

Kaya S, Argan M, Yetim G. From experience to summit or vice versa ? Netnography Study on a Virtual Community of Mountaineering i 2017;5(7): 1117–1126. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050705

Kozinets R. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online; 2010.

Setiawan RA, Setyohadi DB. Analisis Komunikasi sosial media twitter sebagai saluran layanan pelanggan provider internet dan Seluler di Indonesia. J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell. 2017;3(1):16. DOI: 10.20473/jisebi.3.1.16-25

Heinonen K, Medberg G. Netnography as a tool for understanding customers: Implications for service research and practice. J. Serv. Mark. 2018;32(6):657–679. DOI: 10.1108/JSM-08-2017-0294

Costello L, Mcdermott M, Wallace R. Netnography : Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. 2017;16:1–12 DOI: 10.1177/1609406917700647

Laucuka A. Communicative functions of hashtags. Econ. Cult. 2018;15(1):56–62 DOI: 10.2478/jec-2018-0006

Zappavigna M. Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Soc. Semiot. 2015;25(3):274–291. DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2014.996948

Cheng Y. How social media is changing crisis communication strategies: Evidence from the updated literature. J. Contingencies Cris. Manag. 2018;26(1): 58–68. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12130.

Mykkänen M, Vos M. The contribution of public relations to organizational decision making: Insights from the literature. Public Relat. J. 2015;9.

Sulaiman A. Memahami teori Konstruksi Sosial Peter L. Berger. Society. 2016; 4(1):15–22. DOI: 10.33019/society.v4i1.32

Giddens A. The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1990.

Edgard L. Social media crisis management : Aligning corporate response strategies with stakeholders. Emotions Online; 2017. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12198

Eriksson M. Lessons for crisis communication on social media: A systematic review of what research tells the practice. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 2018;12(5):526–551. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2018.1510405

Jiao Y, Yang J, Xu S. A study of the impact of social media characteristics on customer adoption intention of social media; 2013. DOI: 10.2991/iaw-sc.2013.252

Nwogwugwu D. Influence of crisis communication strategies on stakeholders’ perception of organizational reputation: A review of research trends. J. Commun. Media Res. 2018l10(2):125–138.

Taşkıran HB. Government public relations in turkey: Social media usage of turkish ministries in relationship building. Online J. Commun. Media Technol. 2016;6(1):48–63. Available:http://search.proquest.com/docview/1761974141?accountid=10382%5Cnhttp://link.library.curtin.edu.au/openurl??url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3Ahightechjournals&atitle=Government+Public+Relations+in+T

Darisman A, Hilman D, Homan DK. Social construction theory of reality : A case study of anti anorexia campaign poster. 2016;9: 149–153.

Sica A. Social construction as fantasy: Reconsidering peter berger and thomas luckmann’s the social construction of reality after 50 years Cult. Sociol. 2016;10(1):37–52. DOI: 10.1177/1749975515614869

Rewindinar P. Triputra, Dua M. Mamah muda morphogenesis in Indonesia. South Asian J. Soc. Stud. Econ. 2019;4(3):1–11. DOI: 10.9734/sajsse/2019/v4i330128