Teachers’ Attributions and Intervention Strategies for Students’ Classroom Misbehaviours: Evidence from Senior High Schools in Komenda Edina Eguafo Abrem Municipality

Main Article Content

Victoria Aba Mensah
Mark, Owusu Amponsah
Bakari Yusif Dramanu

Abstract

 

 

The study explored teachers’ attributions in addressing misbehaviour of students in the classroom. To achieve this, a descriptive survey was adopted through the use of quantitative approach. A sample size of 140 teachers was selected for the study using cluster sampling technique. Questionnaires were used to elicit responses from the selected teachers. Inferential statistics and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the research questions. The findings from the study revealed that generally, teachers in the Komenda Edina Eguafo Abirem Municipality attribute students’ disruptive behaviours to blame and intentionality of the students. Again, in the quest for managing these attributed behaviours, supportive measures were identified by the teachers to be very effective. It was recommended that teachers’ beliefs about causality with reference to student misbehaviour be improved by training teachers to embrace controllable as opposed to non-controllable attributions. Teachers who might otherwise embrace unsupportive interventions may be more open to implementing research-based interventions for students who exhibit problem behaviour.

Keywords:
Teachers, attributions, students, classroom, misbehaviours, intervention strategies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mensah, V. A., Amponsah, M. O., & Dramanu, B. Y. (2020). Teachers’ Attributions and Intervention Strategies for Students’ Classroom Misbehaviours: Evidence from Senior High Schools in Komenda Edina Eguafo Abrem Municipality. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 33(11), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2020/v33i1130270
Section
Original Research Article

References

Little E. Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of students’ problem behaviours. Educational Psychology. 2005;25:369–377.

Kendziora K, Osher D. Starting to turn schools around: The academic outcomes of the Safe Schools, Successful Students Initiative. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research; 2009.

Osher D, Bear GG, Sprague JR, Doyle W. How can we improve school discipline? Educational Researcher. 2010;39:48- 58. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09357618.

Landrum TJ, Tankersley M, Kauffman JM. What is special about special education for students with emotional or behavioural disorders? [Electronic version]. Journal of Special Education. 2003;37:148-156.

Riley T, Ungerleider C. Self-fulfilling prophecy: How teachers’ attributions, expectations, and stereotypes influence the learning opportunities afforded aboriginal students. Canadian Journal of Education. 2012;35(2):303–333.

Erbas D, Turan Y, Asian Y, Dunlap G. Attributions for problem behaviour as described by Turkish teachers of special education. Remedial and Special Education. 2010;31(2):116-125.

Weiner B. A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1995;7(1): 1-25.

Andreou E, Rapti A. Teachers' causal attributions for behaviour problems and perceived efficacy for class management in relation to selected interventions. Behaviour Change. 2010;27:53-67.

Mavropoulou S, Padeliadu S. Teachers’ causal attributions for behaviour problems in relation to perceptions of control. Educational Psychology. 2002;22:191- 202.

Poulou M, Norwich B. Teachers’ causal attributions, cognitive, emotional, and behavioural responses to students with emotional and behavioural difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2000;70:559-581.

Gibson S, Dembo M. Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1984;76(4):569-582.

Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2): 248-287.

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: NY: W.H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt and Co; 1997.

Fiske ST, Taylor SE. Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991.

Jones EE, Nisbett RE. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behaviour. Morristown, N J: General Learning Press; 1971.

Simms AP. The relationship between teachers’ causal attributions for student problem behaviour and teachers’ intervention preferences. A doctoral dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College; 2014.

Epstein M. Reducing behaviour problems in the elementary school classroom: A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2008. Available:http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguides.

Martin E. Vignettes and respondents debriefing for questionnaire design and evaluation. Research report series, survey methodology. Washington DC: U.S. Bureau of Census; 2006.

Arbuckle C, Little E. Teachers’ perceptions and management of disruptive classroom behaviour during the middle years (years five to nine). Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology. 2004;4:59-70.

Saleem S, Mahmood Z. Relationship between emotional and behavioral problems and school performance of adolescents. FWU Journal of Social Sciences. 2012;6:187-193.

Donga MM. The causes and consequences of indiscipline in public and independent secondary schools: A comparison. Min Dissertation and Afrikaans University; 2008.

Evans KD, Miguel. Orphans and schooling in Africa: A Longtitudinal analysis. Demography. 2007;44(1):35-57

Weiner B. The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist. 2010;45(1):28-36.

Dreikurs R. Psychology in the classroom (2nd Ed). New York: Harper and Row; 1968.

Poulou M, Norwich B. Cognitive, emotional, and behavioural responses to students with emotional and behavioural difficulties: A model of decision-making. British Educational Research Journal. 2002;28:111–138.