Main Article Content
This study aimed to assess organizational school climate of University of Eastern Philippines, Pedro Rebadulla Memorial Campus, Catubig Northern .Samar for school year: 2017-2018. It aimed to identify the perception of faculty towards organizational climate in terms of: Supportive Behavior; Directive Behavior ; Engaged Behavior; Intimate Behavior; and Frustrated Behavior; determine the standardized scores of organizational climate; and determine the general openness index among employees in the workplace. Moreover, this study was conducted to improve the organizational climate of the institution by getting or assessing the supportive, directive, engaged, and frustrated behavior from the respective respondents.
This study used a standardized questionnaire which is called the “Organizational Climate Description Questionnaire (OCDQ) adopted from Wayne K Hoy (1991). It is an instrument used to measure important aspects of teacher-teacher and dean-teacher interactions. Along with this, the study was designed with descriptive methodology which involves the analysis of the organizational climate of the university for the school year 2017-2018 and to determine the climate openness of the school specifically focusing on the dimensions or subtest covered by the Organizational Climate Questionnaire (OCDQ-RS).
This study found out that the organizational climate was higher than 84% of the schools from the normative samples, and the openness index of the organizational climate scored 380.9 The University falls below the average range for openness. Finally, it is recommended that the University should conduct an intervention on how improve the openness index of the organizational climate.
Liu & Lin. Environmental Variation of studies of Organizational Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012;60:459-465.
Kuldeep Kaur, Gurpreet Randhawa. Climate and Commitment: An Analysis of Food Production Industry; 2014.
James et.al. Gaining a Competitive Advantage through a Strategic Human Resource Management; 2018.
Hoy WK, Miskel C. Education administration: Theory, research, and practice, (7th edn) (New York, McGraw-Hill); 2005. Hoy WK, Sabo DJ. Quality middle schools: Open and healthy (Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press); 1998.
Craig WM, Pepler DJ, Murphy A, McCuaig Edge H. what works in? bullying prevention? in: E. Vernberg & B. Biggs (Eds) Preventing and treating bullying and victimization (Oxford, Oxford University Press). 2010;215–242.
Skiba R, Ritter S, Simmons A, Peterson R, Miller C. The Safe and Responsive Schools Project: A school reform model for implementing best practices in violence prevention, in: S. Jimerson & M. Furlong (Eds) Handbook of school violence and school safety (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates). 2006;631–649.
Borum R, Cornell D, Modzeleski W, Jimerson S. what can be done about school shootings? A review of the evidence, Educational Researcher. 2010;39(1):27–37.
Thapa A, Cohen J, Guffey S, Higgins-D’Alessandro A. A review of school climate research, Review of Educational Research. 2013;83(3):357–385.
Hattie JC. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement (London, Routledge). School climate, safety, student achievement and well-bring. 2009; 129
Freeman JG, King M, Pickett W, Craig W, Elgar F, Janssen I, Klinger D. The health of Canada’s young people: A mental health focus (Ottawa, ON, Public Health Agency of Canada); 2011.
Booren LM, Hand, DJ, Power TG. Examining perceptions of school safety strategies, school climate, and violence, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. 2011;9(2):171–187.
Jorge Imer Gaviria-Rivera/Esteban Lopez Zapata. Transformational Leadership, Organizational Climate, and Job Satisfaction; 2019.
Permarupan et. al. Organizational climate nurtures a positive environment for the workforce; 2013.
Sabia Singh, Gurpreet Randhawa. Exploring Work Alienation: A Proposed Model of Predictors and Consequences; 2013.