A Framework for Appraising Education

Main Article Content

K. C. Koutsopoulos

Abstract

Appraisal is the major performance management tool that is widely used to measure the efficiency and effectiveness of education in different contexts. In the European education environment, it has been recognized that the transition from learning to learning outcomes relies on developing appraisal frameworks that can appraise what a student knows, understands and mainly how to utilize what he has learned, as well as on evaluation frameworks of programs and in general of the educational approach. This paper has two main objectives. Firstly, it critically reviews the extant literature on student/program appraisal of the European education. Secondly, based on that review it presents a common framework for student assessment and program evaluation, which relies on four pedagogical issues: The PRACTICE applied, focusing on the students’ knowledge achieved and on the design of the educational approach; the TOOL utilized that concerns the data collection and the data base creation; and the APPROACH in appraising, which includes the analyses performed and the time to materialize them. These three are creating a three-dimensional space, within which any aspect of the fourth issue, the NATURE of both the student assessment and the project evaluation, can take any position in this three-dimensional space.

Keywords:
Educational appraisal, student assessment, program evaluation, assessment, evaluation framework

Article Details

How to Cite
Koutsopoulos, K. C. (2020). A Framework for Appraising Education. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 33(11), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2020/v33i1130279
Section
Original Research Article

References

Huselid MA, Jackson SE, Schuler RS. Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal. 1997;40;171-188.

Hselid MA. The Impact of human resource management practices on turnover and productivity. The Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38(3):635-872

Erez M, Kanfer FH. The role of goal acceptance in goal setting and task performance. The Academy of Management Review. 1983;8(3):454–463. Accessed 4 December 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/257834

UNESCO. The promise of large-scale learning assessments: acknowledging limits to unlock opportunities. Paris: UNESCO; 2019.

Kuh GD, Jankowski N, Ikenberry SO. Knowing what students know and can do: The current state of learning outcomes assessment in U.S. colleges and Universities. Urbana: University of Illinois; 2014.

Serova H, Sternadel D, Mašidlauskaitė R. Assessment practices for 21st century learning: Review of evidence, NESET II report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. Accessed 4 December 2020. Available: AR1_20172.pdf (nesetweb.eu)

Shute VJ. Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 2008;78(2):153-189.

Hattie J, Timberley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 2007;77(1):81-112.

Nguyen Q, Thorne S, Rienties B. How do students engage with computer-based assessments: Impact of study breaks on intertemporal engagement and pass rates? Behaviormetrika. 2018;45(3):597–614.

Russell MK. Technology-aided formative assessment of learning: New developments and applications. In Andrade HL, Cizek GJ. Editors. Handbook of Formative Assessment London: Routledge. 2010;125-138.

Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage; 1994.

Charles AT, Charles BT. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1998.

Aspire Academy. SOFIA Kick-Off Assessment Report. Doha, Qatar: Aspire Academy; 2016. Accessed 4 December 2020. Available: SoFIA (sofianet.org)

Koutsopoulos CK, Economou V. School on Cloud: Towards Unity not Uniformity in Education. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioral Science. 2016;16(1): 1-11.

OECD. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Revised edition). Paris: OECD. 2013;I. Accessed 4 December 2020. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en

Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, Teddlie CB. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1998.

Suskie LA. Assessing Student Learning: A Common-Sense Guide. 2nd Ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.

Stassen M, Doherty K, Poe M. Program-based Review and Assessment: Tools and Techniques for Program Improvement. Office of Academic Planning and Assessment (OAPA). Amherst: University of Massachusetts; 2001. Accessed 4 December 2020. Available:http://www.umass.edu/oapa/oapa/publications/online_handbooks/program_based.pdf

Clarke M. Framework for building an effective student assessment system. SABER working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank; 2011. Accessed 4 December 2020 Available:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED553178.pdf.

Hubert J. Hauser R. High stakes Testing for tracking, promoting, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

Black P, Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2009;21(1):5-31.

Accessed 4 December 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Holmes BT, FitzGibbon B, Savage A, Meehan S. Communal Constructivism: Students constructing learning for as well as with others. Proceedings of SITE 2001, Florida, USA. Accessed 4 December 2020. Available: Communal constructivism – Edu Tech Wiki (unige.ch)

Fowler C, Mayes J. Learning relationships from theory to design. In Squires D, Conole G, Jacobs G, editors. The changing face of learning technology. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. 2000;39-50.

Koutsopoulos KC, Papoutsis P. School on the cloud: Transforming Education. Education Policy Analysis and Strategic Results. 2015;11(1):31-47.

Galitz W. The Essential Guide to User interface design: An introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.

Johnson D. Teaching outside the lines: developing creativity in every learner. Newbury Park: Sage; 2015.

Hattie J, Timberley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 2007;77(1):81-112.